Conjecture on optimal input and measurement angles for Pauli channel tomography

About 13 years old · traced to

Let λ‾\underline{\lambda} denote the channel contraction parameters and let NN be the number of channel uses. Let h~(λ‾,0‾,τ‾,ϑ‾,N)\tilde h(\underline{\lambda},\underline{0},\underline{\tau},\underline{\vartheta},N) be the loss function for estimating the angle parameters, with input and measurement angle parameters τ‾\underline{\tau} and ϑ‾\underline{\vartheta}. For a minimizer (τ‾opt,ϑ‾opt)(\underline{\tau}_{opt},\underline{\vartheta}_{opt}), the conjecture asserts the following. Optimal-angle conjecture. For any fixed parameters λ‾\underline{\lambda} and NN, if h~(λ‾,0‾,τ‾,ϑ‾,N)\tilde h(\underline{\lambda},\underline{0},\underline{\tau},\underline{\vartheta},N) is minimal at (τ‾opt,ϑ‾opt)(\underline{\tau}_{opt},\underline{\vartheta}_{opt}), then

τ‾opt=ϑ‾opt.\underline{\tau}_{opt}=\underline{\vartheta}_{opt}.

Moreover, the estimation strategies with

τ‾1=ϑ‾1=(π4,π4,0),τ‾2=ϑ‾2=(π4,0,π4)\underline{\tau}_1=\underline{\vartheta}_1=\left(\frac{\pi}{4},\frac{\pi}{4},0\right),\qquad \underline{\tau}_2=\underline{\vartheta}_2=\left(\frac{\pi}{4},0,\frac{\pi}{4}\right)

are nearly optimal. The claim is based on numerical optimization because the general six-variable minimization problem cannot be solved analytically in the source. The precise meaning of “nearly optimal” and a general proof are not supplied.

References

Primary source

Dániel Virosztek, László Ruppert and Katalin M. Hangos, “Pauli channel tomography with unknown channel directions”, arXiv:1304.4492 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.