The minimal superpermutation length conjecture

A superpermutation on nn symbols is a string containing each of the n!n! permutations of those symbols as a contiguous substring; a minimal superpermutation is one of shortest possible length. The known recursive construction produces superpermutations of length

k=1nk!.\sum_{k=1}^n k!.

Minimal superpermutation length conjecture. The length of the minimal superpermutation on nn symbols is

k=1nk!.\sum_{k=1}^n k!.

The quantity n!+n1n!+n-1 gives a trivial lower bound, but it is not tight for n3n\geq 3. The formula agrees with the optimal values known for n4n\leq 4, while minimal superpermutations for larger nn were not computable by the brute-force methods discussed in the source.

References

Primary source

Nathaniel Johnston, “Non-Uniqueness of Minimal Superpermutations”, arXiv:1303.4150 (2013).

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed solved

An explicit six-symbol example disproved the proposed formula in 2014, but the true shortest lengths from six symbols onward remain unknown.

Ashlock and Tillotson posed the conjecture in 1993: the shortest length should be k=1nk!\sum_{k=1}^n k!. It is now known to be false, although the underlying optimization problem remains open for n6n \ge 6.

Known results

  • The minimum was established for n4n \le 4; the recursive construction is optimal there (Johnston, 2013).
  • Chaffin’s exhaustive search established the n=5n=5 minimum as 153=k=15k!153=\sum_{k=1}^5 k! and found exactly 88 examples (2014).
  • Houston’s construction gives length 872872 for n=6n=6, below the conjectured 873873 (2014).

August 2014 counterexample

Houston’s explicit n=6n=6 construction disproves the formula. Its recursive extension yields lengths below k=1nk!\sum_{k=1}^n k! for every n6n \ge 6, but the exact minimum is unknown there; later records include a(7)5908a(7)\le 5908, a(8)46205a(8)\le 46205, and a(9)408966a(9)\le 408966.

Current status (as of August 2026): The conjectured formula is disproved for n=6n=6 and therefore for all n6n \ge 6 as a universal claim; the exact minimal lengths remain open for n6n \ge 6.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.