The weak orthogonality relation for Fourier coefficients of Maass forms

Let ϕj\phi_j be Hecke–Maass forms for SL(N,Z)\operatorname{SL}(N,\mathbb{Z}) with Fourier coefficients Aj(m1,,mN1)A_j(m_1,\ldots,m_{N-1}). Under the same assumptions on the test functions hTh_T and weights ωj(T)\omega_j(T) as in the orthogonality relation, define

ωj(T)=hT(ν(j))L(1,ϕj,Ad).\omega_j(T)=\frac{h_T(\nu^{(j)})}{L(1,\phi_j,\operatorname{Ad})}.

The weak orthogonality relation. For positive integers m1,,mN1m_1,\ldots,m_{N-1},

limTj=1Aj(m1,,mN1)ωj(T)j=1ωj(T)={1,m1==mN1=1,0,otherwise.\lim_{T\to\infty}\frac{\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}A_j(m_1,\ldots,m_{N-1})\omega_j(T)}{\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\omega_j(T)}=\begin{cases}1,&m_1=\cdots=m_{N-1}=1,\\0,&\text{otherwise.}\end{cases}

This is introduced as a weaker consequence of the full orthogonality relation and is used as a conjectural input for the paper’s distribution results; no resolution is given.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Fan Zhou, “Weighted Sato-Tate Vertical Distribution of the Satake Parameter of Maass Forms on PGL(N)”, arXiv:1303.0889 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.