The odd-argument 2-adic binomial reciprocal-sum valuation conjecture

Let f:NQ2f:{\mathbb N}\to{\mathbb Q}_2 be defined by

f(n)=k=0n(nk)1.f(n)=\sum_{k=0}^n\binom nk^{-1}.

Let lg(n)=[log2(n)]\operatorname{lg}(n)=\left[\log_2(n)\right] and let ν=ν2\nu=\nu_2. The integer ee is such that 0k<2e10\le k<2^{e-1}.

The odd-argument 2-adic valuation conjecture. If 0k<2e10\le k<2^{e-1}, then

ν(f(2e+2k+1)f(2k+1))e2lg(k+3)+2ν(k+1).\nu\bigl(f(2^e+2k+1)-f(2k+1)\bigr)\ge e-2\operatorname{lg}(k+3)+2\nu(k+1).

The authors present this as a potentially more tractable consequence of their study of 22-definability. The conjecture concerns valuation growth along the odd arguments and is intended to help establish 22-definability for additional 22-adic integers.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Donald M. Davis, “For which 2-adic integers x can _k xk^-1 be defined?”, arXiv:1301.2532 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.