Jacquet–Langlands equality of localized new homology

Let Y(KΣ)Y(K_{\Sigma}) and Y(KΣ)Y'(K_{\Sigma}) be a Jacquet–Langlands pair, let T\mathbf{T} be the relevant Hecke algebra, and let m\mathfrak{m} be a non-Eisenstein maximal ideal. Write H1(Y(KΣ),Z)mnewH_1(Y(K_{\Sigma}),\mathbf{Z})^{\mathrm{new}}_{\mathfrak{m}} and H1(Y(KΣ),Z)mnewH_1(Y'(K_{\Sigma}),\mathbf{Z})^{\mathrm{new}}_{\mathfrak{m}} for the localized new homology groups. Jacquet–Langlands homological conjecture. If m\mathfrak{m} is not Eisenstein, then

H1(Y(KΣ),Z)mnew=H1(Y(KΣ),Z)mnew.\left|H_1(Y(K_{\Sigma}),\mathbf{Z})^{\mathrm{new}}_{\mathfrak{m}}\right|=\left|H_1(Y'(K_{\Sigma}),\mathbf{Z})^{\mathrm{new}}_{\mathfrak{m}}\right|.

This predicts equality of the localized torsion orders on the two sides of a Jacquet–Langlands correspondence; the source explains it heuristically through a common Hecke algebra.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Frank Calegari and Akshay Venkatesh, “A torsion Jacquet–Langlands correspondence”, arXiv:1212.3847 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.