The Short Curve conjecture for Weil–Petersson geodesics

About 14 years old · traced to

Given a Weil–Petersson geodesic g:(a,b)→Teich⁡(S)g:(a,b) \to \operatorname{Teich}(S), let its forward and backward end invariants be (ν−,ν+)(\nu^{-},\nu^{+}). For each subsurface Z⊆SZ\subseteq S that is not a three-holed sphere, let dZ(ν−,ν+)d_Z(\nu^{-},\nu^{+}) denote the distance in the curve complex of ZZ between the projections of the end invariants. For a simple closed curve α\alpha, write ℓα(g(t))\ell_\alpha(g(t)) for its length along gg.

Short Curve conjecture. If gg is a Weil–Petersson geodesic with end invariant (ν−,ν+)(\nu^{-},\nu^{+}), then:

  1. For every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 there is an A>0A>0 such that, if dZ(ν−,ν+)>Ad_Z(\nu^{-},\nu^{+})>A, then
inf⁡tℓα(g(t))≤ϵ\inf_t\ell_\alpha(g(t))\leq\epsilon

for every α∈∂Z\alpha\in\partial Z. 2. For every A>0A>0 there is an ϵ>0\epsilon>0 such that, if

inf⁡tℓα(g(t))≤ϵ,\inf_t\ell_\alpha(g(t))\leq\epsilon,

then there is a subsurface Z⊊SZ\subsetneq S such that α∈∂Z\alpha\in\partial Z and dZ(ν−,ν+)>Ad_Z(\nu^{-},\nu^{+})>A.

The conjecture asserts that large subsurface coefficients exactly detect the appearance of short boundary curves along Weil–Petersson geodesics. It gives a subsurface-projection coding of geodesic behavior in the moduli space, generalizing the role of continued fractions for geodesics on the modular surface.

References

Primary source

Babak Modami, “Prescribing the behavior of Weil-Petersson geodesics in the moduli space of Riemann surfaces”, arXiv:1212.0051 (2015).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.