The Bernstein-Sato specialization equality conjecture

About 14 years old · traced to

Let F=(f1,3ellots,fr)F=(f_1, 3ellots,f_r), let M∈Np×rM\in\mathbb{N}^{p\times r} be non-zero, let m∈Np{\bf m}\in\mathbb{N}^p, and let FMF^M and the monomial maps ϕM\phi_M be defined as in the source. Write BFm⋅MB_F^{{\bf m}\cdot M} and BFMmB_{F^M}^{\bf m} for the corresponding Bernstein-Sato ideals. Bernstein-Sato specialization equality conjecture. For all non-zero M∈Np×rM\in\mathbb{N}^{p\times r} and all vectors m∈Np{\bf m}\in\mathbb{N}^p,

ϕM−1(Exp⁡(V(BFm⋅M)))=Exp⁡(V(BFMm)).\phi_M^{-1}(\operatorname{Exp}(V(B_F^{{\bf m}\cdot M})))=\operatorname{Exp}(V(B_{F^M}^{\bf m})).

In particular, for all MM with nonzero columns,

ϕM−1(Exp⁡(V(BF)))=Exp⁡(V(BFM)).\phi_M^{-1}(\operatorname{Exp}(V(B_F)))=\operatorname{Exp}(V(B_{F^M})).

The preceding proposition establishes only an inclusion, so this proposed converse equality is not proved there. Its general validity is open.

References

Primary source

Nero Budur, “Bernstein-Sato ideals and local systems”, arXiv:1209.3725 (2013).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.