Mumford–Tate and Isogeny conjectures for Shimura-type structures

From papers

Let (VZ,μs,μρx~,l)(V_{\mathbb Z},\mu\circ s,\mu\circ\rho_{\widetilde{x},l}) be an (,l)(\infty,l)-integral structure of Shimura type. Let HQlH_{\mathbb Q_l} be the identity component of the Zariski closure of the image of ρx~,l\rho_{\widetilde{x},l}, and let MM be the Mumford–Tate group of ss. Mumford–Tate and Isogeny conjectures. The Mumford–Tate conjecture asserts

HQl=MQl.H_{\mathbb Q_l}=M_{\mathbb Q_l}.

The Isogeny conjecture asserts that every (,l)(\infty,l)-integral structure of Shimura type is Tate. These are the paper's combined formulations of the two conjectures; the source does not provide a resolution status for either assertion.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Emmanuel Ullmo and Andrei Yafaev, “Mumford-Tate and Generalised Shafarevich conjectures”, arXiv:1209.0947 (2012).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.