Norbury–Scott conjecture on stationary Gromov–Witten invariants of the projective line

Let Wg,nP1(t1,,tn)W_{g,n}^{\mathbb{P}^1}(t_1,\dots,t_n) denote the Eynard–Orantin differential forms associated with the stationary Gromov–Witten theory of P1\mathbb{P}^1, and let Fg,nP1(t1,,tn)F_{g,n}^{\mathbb{P}^1}(t_1,\dots,t_n) be the corresponding generating functions. For stable (g,n)(g,n), write did_i for differentiation with respect to tit_i. Norbury–Scott conjecture. The stationary Gromov–Witten invariants of P1\mathbb{P}^1 satisfy the Eynard–Orantin recursion; equivalently, for (g,n)(g,n) in the stable range,

Wg,nP1(t1,,tn)=d1dnFg,nP1(t1,,tn).W_{g,n}^{\mathbb{P}^1}(t_1,\dots,t_n)=d_1\cdots d_nF_{g,n}^{\mathbb{P}^1}(t_1,\dots,t_n).

The conjecture asserts that the generating functions of stationary Gromov–Witten invariants are governed by the spectral-curve recursion, extending the explicitly verified initial cases to all stable (g,n)(g,n).

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Olivia Dumitrescu, Motohico Mulase, Brad Safnuk and Adam Sorkin, “The spectral curve of the Eynard-Orantin recursion via the Laplace transform”, arXiv:1202.1159 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.