The missing lemma for the modulo 23 Schröter–Russell–Ramanujan identity

Let $N_0=3$, $t=12$, $C_1=\dots=C_{12}=46$, and $m=3$. Set

$$(A_1,\dots,A_{12})=(1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,23),$$ $$(B_1,\dots,B_{12})=(0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22).$$

The missing lemma. Condition (i) of Theorem holds for these parameters.

A bijective proof would complete the unified combinatorial approach to the five Schröter, Russell and Ramanujan type identities by yielding a bijective proof of the identity modulo 23, which is otherwise proved analytically in the cited work.