The upper bound conjecture for equivalence-class intersections in simplicial semigroup rings

Let BB be the affine semigroup under consideration, let BAB_A denote its simplicial subsemigroup, and let \sim be the equivalence relation on BB. For x,yBx,y\in B, define

h(x,y):=(min{x[1],y[1]},min{x[2],y[2]},,min{x[d],y[d]}).h(x,y):=(\min\{x_{[1]},y_{[1]}\},\min\{x_{[2]},y_{[2]}\},\ldots,\min\{x_{[d]},y_{[d]}\}).

For x,yB{0}x,y\in B\setminus\{0\}, let δ(x,y)\delta(x,y) be the minimum, over the associated sequences, of the number of equivalence-class coincidences between the sequences for xx and yy, minus two. Upper bound conjecture. Let x,yBA{0}x,y\in B_A\setminus\{0\} with xyx\sim y. Then

δ(x,y)degh(x,y)1.\delta(x,y)\leq \deg h(x,y)-1.

The bound was proposed to control the number of equivalence classes arising from two sequences in the proof of the Eisenbud–Goto conjecture for monomial curves and simplicial semigroup rings. It is refuted: for equivalent elements e1,e2Be_1,e_2\in B, one has δ(e1,e2)=2>1=degh(e1,e2)1\delta(e_1,e_2)=2>-1=\deg h(e_1,e_2)-1.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Max Joachim Nitsche, “A combinatorial proof of the Eisenbud-Goto conjecture for monomial curves and some simplicial semigroup rings”, arXiv:1110.0423 (2011).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.