The non-abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture
The non-abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture
Let be a Galois CM-extension with Galois group . Let be a finite set of places of containing all ramified and infinite places. For , define as the finite places dividing , and call an anti-unit when . Let , where is the group of roots of unity in . Non-abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture. One has
and, for every and every fractional ideal of , there is an anti-unit such that
Moreover, for every finite set such that holds, there is an such that
for every . This strengthens the non-abelian Brumer conjecture by predicting principalization by anti-units together with a refined relation for admissible auxiliary sets. It is attributed in the source to the cited formulation of the non-abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture.
Equivalent formulations 2
Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.
Non-abelian Brumer-Stark conjecture
Let be a finite Galois CM-extension with Galois group . Let contain all ramified finite places and all infinite places of , let , and let be the associated denominator ideal. For , let be the finite places whose primes divide ; call an anti-unit when . Non-abelian Brumer-Stark conjecture. For every and every fractional ideal of , there is an anti-unit such that
and, for every finite set such that holds, there is an satisfying
for every . This is the non-abelian refinement of the Brumer-Stark conjecture, strengthening ideal annihilation to the principality of explicitly acted-on ideals and compatibility with ray-unit data.
source: Andreas Nickel, “Equivariant Iwasawa theory and non-abelian Stark-type conjectures”, arXiv:1109.5525 (2012).
Non-abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture
Let be a Galois CM-extension with Galois group , and let be a finite set of places of containing all archimedean places and all places ramified in . Let , , , , and have the meanings defined in the paper; an anti-unit satisfies . Non-abelian Brumer–Stark conjecture. For every ,
Moreover, for every non-zero fractional ideal of , there is an anti-unit with
and, for every finite set satisfying , an such that
for each . This is a refined non-abelian form of Brumer–Stark, imposing both principality and explicit unit relations. It is open in general.
source: Andreas Nickel, “Conjectures of Brumer, Gross and Stark”, arXiv:1707.04432 (2017).
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Andreas Nickel, “Integrality of Stickelberger elements and the equivariant Tamagawa number conjecture”, arXiv:1108.1062 (2014).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.