Homological and cohomological inclusion conjecture for curve-complex models

Let SS be a finite-type surface. Let C(S)sub\mathcal{C} (S)_{\operatorname{sub}} be the subspace model of the curve complex, and let UPML(S)cw\mathcal{U} \mathcal{P} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{L} (S)_{\operatorname{cw}} and UPML(S)\mathcal{U} \mathcal{P} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{L} (S) denote the CW-topologized and original versions of the unmeasured projective measured lamination space, respectively. Homological inclusion conjecture. The bijective maps I:C(S)C(S)subI:\mathcal{C} (S)\to\mathcal{C} (S)_{\operatorname{sub}} and I:UPML(S)cwUPML(S)I:\mathcal{U} \mathcal{P} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{L} (S)_{\operatorname{cw}}\to\mathcal{U} \mathcal{P} \mathcal{M} \mathcal{L} (S) induce inclusions in Steenrod homology and Čech cohomology. The conjecture is presented as a step toward parts (2) and (3) of the duality conjecture; the source gives no resolution.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

David Gabai, “On the topology of ending lamination space”, arXiv:1105.3648 (2011).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.