Väisälä's uniqueness, prolongation and convexity conjectures for quasihyperbolic balls

About 15 years old · traced to

Let Ω⊂Rn\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n be a domain and let x,y∈Ωx,y \in \Omega. For z∈Ωz\in\Omega, write d(z)=dist⁡(z,∂Ω)d(z)=\operatorname{dist}(z,\partial\Omega), and for a rectifiable curve γ\gamma in Ω\Omega define its quasihyperbolic length by

ℓk(γ)=∫γ∣dz∣d(z).\ell_k(\gamma)=\int_\gamma \frac{|dz|}{d(z)}.

The quasihyperbolic metric is k(x,y)=inf⁡γℓk(γ)k(x,y)=\inf_\gamma\ell_k(\gamma), where the infimum is over curves joining xx to yy, and Bk(x,r)={z∈Ω:k(x,z)<r}B_k(x,r)=\{z\in\Omega:k(x,z)<r\}.

Väisälä's uniqueness, prolongation and convexity conjectures. There are universal constants cu,cp,cc>0c_u,c_p,c_c>0 such that:

  1. if k(x,y)<cuk(x,y)<c_u, then there is only one quasihyperbolic geodesic from xx to yy;
  2. if γ\gamma is a quasihyperbolic geodesic from xx to yy with ℓk(γ)=k(x,y)<cp\ell_k(\gamma)=k(x,y)<c_p, then there is a quasihyperbolic geodesic γ′\gamma' from xx to some y′y' such that γ⊂γ′\gamma\subset\gamma' and ℓ(γ′)=cp\ell(\gamma')=c_p;
  3. the quasihyperbolic ball Bk(x,r)B_k(x,r) is strictly convex for all x∈Ωx\in\Omega and r<ccr<c_c.

These conjectures concern local uniqueness and extension of quasihyperbolic geodesics and the local convexity of quasihyperbolic metric balls. The surrounding discussion notes that quasihyperbolic geodesics exist in every domain and that quasihyperbolic balls are therefore connected, while smoothness and stronger geometric properties require additional hypotheses; the status of these three conjectures is not specified here.

References

Primary source

Riku Klén, Antti Rasila and Jarno Talponen, “Quasihyperbolic Geometry in Euclidean and Banach Spaces”, arXiv:1104.3745 (2011).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.