The Euler-to-homological convolution equivalence conjecture

Let econv(Gr)0\mathrm{\mathbf{econv}}(\mathrm{Gr})_0 be the subcategory of constructible-function convolutions generated by the relevant Satake-fibre functions, and let hconv(Gr)\mathrm{\mathbf{hconv}}(\mathrm{Gr}) be the corresponding category of top-homology convolutions. For a constructible function ff on a convolution variety ZZ, define

Ξ(f)=XIrr(Z)f(X)[X],\Xi(f)=\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(Z)}f(X)[X],

where f(X)f(X) is the value of ff on a dense open subset of the irreducible variety XX. Euler-to-homological convolution conjecture. The map Ξ\Xi between hom spaces restricts to an equivalence of pivotal categories from econv(Gr)0\mathrm{\mathbf{econv}}(\mathrm{Gr})_0 to hconv(Gr)\mathrm{\mathbf{hconv}}(\mathrm{Gr}), up to a sign correction of the tensor and pivotal structures. The conjecture would connect the Euler-characteristic and homological versions of geometric Satake and would imply the earlier representation-category conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Bruce Fontaine, Joel Kamnitzer and Greg Kuperberg, “Buildings, spiders, and geometric Satake”, arXiv:1103.3519 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.