Atiyah–Sutcliffe's multiplicative conjecture for the Atiyah determinant

From papers

Let x1,,xnx_1,\dots,x_n be distinct points in R3\mathbb{R}^3, and let D(x1,,xn)D(x_1,\dots,x_n) be the Atiyah determinant; for each ii, write D(x1,,xi1,xi+1,,xn)D(x_1,\dots,x_{i-1},x_{i+1},\dots,x_n) for the determinant associated with the configuration obtained by deleting xix_i. Atiyah–Sutcliffe's multiplicative conjecture. For all such configurations,

D(x1,,xn)n2i=1nD(x1,,xi1,xi+1,,xn).|D(x_1,\dots,x_n)|^{n-2}\geq \prod_{i=1}^n |D(x_1,\dots,x_{i-1},x_{i+1},\dots,x_n)|.

This is the third conjecture formulated by Atiyah and Sutcliffe. The paper discusses evidence and special cases, but no general proof is given.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Marcin Mazur and Bogdan V. Petrenko, “On the conjectures of Atiyah and Sutcliffe”, arXiv:1102.4662 (2011).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.