Kapovich–Weidmann conjecture on higher stabilization for Nielsen equivalence

From papers

Let km2k\ge m\ge 2, and let

G=a1,,ak,b1,,bmai=ui(bˉ), bj=vj(aˉ) for 1ik, 1jm.G=\langle a_1,\ldots,a_k,b_1,\ldots,b_m\mid a_i=u_i(\bar b),\ b_j=v_j(\bar a)\text{ for }1\le i\le k,\ 1\le j\le m\rangle.

Assume the tuples of defining words lie in the generic subsets specified in the construction and satisfy u1=v1|u_1|=|v_1|.

Kapovich–Weidmann higher-stabilization conjecture. For every 1t<m1\le t<m, the generating (k+t)(k+t)-tuple (a1,,ak,1,,1)(a_1,\ldots,a_k,1,\ldots,1) is not equivalent to a (k+t)(k+t)-tuple of type (b1,,bt+1,g1,,gk1)(b_1,\ldots,b_{t+1},g_1,\ldots,g_{k-1}).

This strengthens the preceding one-stabilization obstruction: fewer than mm stabilizations should not suffice to relate the generating tuples. The notation for the generic subsets and the precise equivalence relation is inherited from the surrounding construction.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Ilya Kapovich and Richard Weidmann, “Nielsen equivalence in small cancellation groups”, arXiv:1011.5862 (2012).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.