Kapovich–Weidmann conjecture on higher stabilization for Nielsen equivalence

About 16 years old · traced to

Let k≥m≥2k\ge m\ge 2, and let

G=⟨a1,…,ak,b1,…,bm∣ai=ui(bˉ), bj=vj(aˉ) for 1≤i≤k, 1≤j≤m⟩.G=\langle a_1,\ldots,a_k,b_1,\ldots,b_m\mid a_i=u_i(\bar b),\ b_j=v_j(\bar a)\text{ for }1\le i\le k,\ 1\le j\le m\rangle.

Assume the tuples of defining words lie in the generic subsets specified in the construction and satisfy ∣u1∣=∣v1∣|u_1|=|v_1|.

Kapovich–Weidmann higher-stabilization conjecture. For every 1≤t<m1\le t<m, the generating (k+t)(k+t)-tuple (a1,…,ak,1,…,1)(a_1,\ldots,a_k,1,\ldots,1) is not equivalent to a (k+t)(k+t)-tuple of type (b1,…,bt+1,g1,…,gk−1)(b_1,\ldots,b_{t+1},g_1,\ldots,g_{k-1}).

This strengthens the preceding one-stabilization obstruction: fewer than mm stabilizations should not suffice to relate the generating tuples. The notation for the generic subsets and the precise equivalence relation is inherited from the surrounding construction.

References

Primary source

Ilya Kapovich and Richard Weidmann, “Nielsen equivalence in small cancellation groups”, arXiv:1011.5862 (2012).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.