Tóth's phase-transition conjecture for spontaneous magnetization
Let denote the spontaneous magnetization of the quantum Heisenberg ferromagnet, represented through the interchange process on at inverse temperature . Let be the size of the cycle containing at time , and let be the number of cycles of length . Tóth's conjecture. The function admits a phase transition: there exists some such that
and
This conjecture concerns the existence of an ordered, or high-, phase in the quantum Heisenberg ferromagnet. The existence of that phase remains open; the main unresolved issue is not sharpness or uniqueness of the transition, but whether the high- phase exists at all.
References
Primary source
Gil Alon and Gady Kozma, “The probability of long cycles in interchange processes”, arXiv:1009.3723 (2012).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 4
RemarkAI-assistedClaimed by OpenAI. Claims Bloch's low-temperature T^(3/2) spontaneous-magnetization law for every fixed positive quantum spin in three-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnets with nonnegative symmetric finite-range generating interactions, including anisotropic couplings, with the exact dispersion-dependent coefficient.See full solution
Claimed by OpenAI. Claims Bloch's low-temperature T^(3/2) spontaneous-magnetization law for every fixed positive quantum spin in three-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnets with nonnegative symmetric finite-range generating interactions, including anisotropic couplings, with the exact dispersion-dependent coefficient.
Scope relative to this problem: This claims the leading Bloch T^(3/2) low-temperature magnetization law for each fixed positive spin in three dimensions, for nonnegative symmetric finite-range generating interactions, including anisotropic couplings. It gives the dispersion-dependent coefficient. It is ordered-phase observable progress and does not by itself determine a sharp critical temperature or identify every target interchange-process convention.
GitHub repository: https://github.com/openai/math
- OpenAI-271-01-Bloch-s-Law-for-Finite-Range-Heisenberg-Ferromagnets-in-Three-Dimensions.pdfOpen
RemarkAI-assistedClaimed by OpenAI. For every fixed positive quantum spin in the three-dimensional nearest-neighbor Heisenberg ferromagnet, claims that the low-temperature magnetization deficit agrees with the ideal-magnon density through order beta^(-5/2), giving the first lattice correction to Bloch’s law.See full solution
Claimed by OpenAI. For every fixed positive quantum spin in the three-dimensional nearest-neighbor Heisenberg ferromagnet, claims that the low-temperature magnetization deficit agrees with the ideal-magnon density through order beta^(-5/2), giving the first lattice correction to Bloch’s law.
Scope relative to this problem: This is the first lattice correction for the three-dimensional nearest-neighbor quantum Heisenberg ferromagnet at each fixed positive spin: the magnetization deficit agrees with ideal-magnon density through beta^(-5/2). It is low-temperature refinement, not a complete all-temperature phase diagram or an inferred interchange-process identity.
GitHub repository: https://github.com/openai/math
- OpenAI-271-02-The-first-lattice-correction-to-Bloch-s-law.pdfOpen
RemarkAI-assistedClaimed by OpenAI. Claims a uniform-direction, deterministic-positive-radius limiting magnetization law for the three-dimensional nearest-neighbor isotropic quantum Heisenberg ferromagnet at every fixed positive quantum spin and sufficiently low positive temperature, taking growing even periodic cubes.See full solution
Claimed by OpenAI. Claims a uniform-direction, deterministic-positive-radius limiting magnetization law for the three-dimensional nearest-neighbor isotropic quantum Heisenberg ferromagnet at every fixed positive quantum spin and sufficiently low positive temperature, taking growing even periodic cubes.
Scope relative to this problem: This claims a deterministic positive-radius, uniform-direction limiting magnetization distribution in growing even periodic three-dimensional cubes, at fixed positive spin and sufficiently low positive temperature. It is ordered-phase progress with these boundary/limit conventions; it does not supply a sharp beta_c value or every all-temperature assertion in the target interchange representation.
GitHub repository: https://github.com/openai/math
- OpenAI-271-03-The-spherical-magnetization-law-for-the-three-dimensional-quantum-Heisenberg-ferromagnet.pdfOpen
RemarkAI-assistedClaimed by OpenAI. Claims spontaneous magnetization in the nearest-neighbor isotropic quantum Heisenberg ferromagnet in every dimension at least three and every positive quantum spin, with a translation-invariant zero-field KMS equilibrium state of magnetization at least one quarter of the spin at sufficiently low positive temperature.See full solution
Claimed by OpenAI. Claims spontaneous magnetization in the nearest-neighbor isotropic quantum Heisenberg ferromagnet in every dimension at least three and every positive quantum spin, with a translation-invariant zero-field KMS equilibrium state of magnetization at least one quarter of the spin at sufficiently low positive temperature.
Scope relative to this problem: This claims a translation-invariant zero-field KMS equilibrium state with magnetization at least one quarter of the spin, for the nearest-neighbor isotropic model in every dimension at least three and each positive spin at sufficiently low positive temperature. It gives an ordered low-temperature phase in that state sense; no sharp beta_c or identification with all finite-box interchange/boundary conventions is inferred.
GitHub repository: https://github.com/openai/math
- OpenAI-271-04-Spontaneous-magnetization-in-the-quantum-Heisenberg-ferromagnet.pdfOpen