The hypergeometric–zeta correspondence for the curves Cz(m,s)\mathcal{C}_{z}^{(m,s)}

About 16 years old · traced to

Let ll and qq be odd primes such that q≡1(modl)q\equiv 1 \pmod{l}, and let z∈Fqz\in\mathbb{F}_{q} with z≠0,1z\neq 0,1. For integers 1≤m,s<l1\leq m,s<l satisfying m+s=lm+s=l, consider the smooth projective curve with affine equation

Cz(m,s):yl=tm(1−t)s(1−zt)m.\mathcal{C}_{z}^{(m,s)}: y^l=t^m(1-t)^s(1-zt)^m.

Using the notation for Fi,q(z)F_{i,q}(z) and ai,q(z)a_{i,q}(z) introduced earlier, the hypergeometric–zeta correspondence. After rearranging terms if necessary,

Fi,q(z)=−ai,q(z)for all 1≤i≤g.F_{i,q}(z)=-a_{i,q}(z)\qquad\text{for all }1\leq i\leq g.

This conjecture proposes an equality between finite-field hypergeometric values and the reciprocal-root contributions to the zeta function of Cz(m,s)\mathcal{C}_{z}^{(m,s)}. The paper states that it remains unproved in full generality, while establishing particular cases and advances toward the general case.

References

Primary source

M. Valentina Vega, “Hypergeometric Functions over Finite Fields and their relations to Algebraic Curves”, arXiv:1008.3401 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.