Hooley's Hypothesis KK^* for diagonal Waring representations

Let rk,k(l)r_{k,k}(l) denote the number of representations of a positive integer ll as a sum of kk positive kkth powers. Hooley's Hypothesis KK^*. For k=2k=2 and every ϵ>0\epsilon>0,

l=1Nrk,k(l)2=O(N1+ϵ)(N).\sum_{l=1}^{N}r_{k,k}(l)^2=O\left(N^{1+\epsilon}\right)\qquad(N\to\infty).

For k3k\geq3,

l=1Nrk,k(l)2=O(N)(N).\sum_{l=1}^{N}r_{k,k}(l)^2=O(N)\qquad(N\to\infty).

This is an average-value analogue of Hardy and Littlewood's Hypothesis KK, which is false for k=3k=3 and expected to be false for larger kk. The conjecture remains open, and would give important mean-value estimates for Weyl sums.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Lillian B. Pierce, “On discrete fractional integral operators and mean values of Weyl Sums”, arXiv:1005.4052 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.