Linear-polynomial coefficient conjecture for Potts-model eigenvalue expansions

Let qq be the Potts-model parameter, let mm be a positive integer, and let λ,=(m)\lambda_{\star,=}(m) and λ,(m)\lambda_{\star,\neq}(m) be the relevant eigenvalues. There exist polynomials E1,E2,E_1,E_2,\ldots and F1,F2,F_1,F_2,\ldots with rational coefficients, each of degree 11, such that

log[(1)m+1(λ,=(m)λ,(m))]==1m1E(m)q+O(qm),\log\left[(-1)^{m+1}\left(\lambda_{\star,=}(m)-\lambda_{\star,\neq}(m)\right)\right]=\sum_{\ell=1}^{m-1}E_\ell(m)q^{-\ell}+O(q^{-m}), log[(1)m+1qmlog(λ,=(m)λ,(m))]==1m1F(m)q+O(qm).-\log\left[(-1)^{m+1}q^m\log\left(\frac{\lambda_{\star,=}(m)}{\lambda_{\star,\neq}(m)}\right)\right]=\sum_{\ell=1}^{m-1}F_\ell(m)q^{-\ell}+O(q^{-m}).

Linear-coefficient conjecture. Both displayed expansions hold. The coefficients have been checked computationally in the ranges reported in the paper, and the relations among the associated expansions explain the observed polynomial structure. A general proof remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Jesús Salas and Alan D. Sokal, “Transfer matrices and partition-function zeros for antiferromagnetic Potts models. VI. Square lattice with special boundary conditions”, arXiv:1002.3761 (2011).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.