The elliptic-curve parity conjecture for irreducible representations

About 16 years old · traced to

Let kk be a number field, let EE be an elliptic curve over kk, and let τ\tau be an irreducible complex representation of Gal⁡(k‾/k)\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{k}/k). Put F=k‾ker⁡(τ)F=\overline{k}^{\operatorname{ker}(\tau)}, and let E(F)τE(F)^\tau denote the τ\tau-isotypic component of E(F)⊗CE(F)\otimes\mathbb{C}. Assume that L(E/k,τ,s)=L(E/k,τ‾,s)L(E/k,\tau,s)=L(E/k,\overline{\tau},s), and define

r(\tau)=\frac{\text{dim}_{_}{\mathbb{C}}E(F)^\tau}{\text{dim}_{(}\tau)}.

Parity conjecture. Under these assumptions,

W(E/k,τ)=(−1)r(τ).W(E/k,\tau)=(-1)^{r(\tau)}.

This is presented as a generalization of the parity conjecture, arising from an extension of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture related to the Deligne–Gross conjecture. Its resolution status is not specified in the supplied text.

References

Primary source

Sunil Chetty, “Comparing local constants of elliptic curves in dihedral extensions”, arXiv:1002.2671 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.