Equality-case integral-closure conjecture for multiplicity bounds

From papers

Let RR, a\mathfrak{a} and JJ be as in the relevant corollary, with positive integers a1,,ad,b1,,bda_1,\ldots,a_d,b_1,\ldots,b_d supplied by that setup. Suppose that

e(a)=(dcJ(a))de(J).e(\mathfrak{a})=\left(\frac{d}{\operatorname{c}_{-}^J(\mathfrak{a})}\right)^d e(J).

Put b1/a1==bd/ad=t/sb_1/a_1=\cdots=b_d/a_d=t/s, where ss and tt are positive integers. Equality-case conjecture. Then at\mathfrak{a}^t and JsJ^s have the same integral closure. The source notes that this is known when d=2d=2, and more generally when {a1,,ad}\{a_1,\ldots,a_d\} has at most two elements; the general case remains open in the stated context.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Craig Huneke, Shunsuke Takagi and Kei-ichi Watanabe, “Multiplicity bounds in graded rings”, arXiv:0912.3853 (2010).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.