Equality-case integral-closure conjecture for multiplicity bounds

About 17 years old · traced to

Let RR, a\mathfrak{a} and JJ be as in the relevant corollary, with positive integers a1,…,ad,b1,…,bda_1,\ldots,a_d,b_1,\ldots,b_d supplied by that setup. Suppose that

e(a)=(dc⁡−J(a))de(J).e(\mathfrak{a})=\left(\frac{d}{\operatorname{c}_{-}^J(\mathfrak{a})}\right)^d e(J).

Put b1/a1=⋯=bd/ad=t/sb_1/a_1=\cdots=b_d/a_d=t/s, where ss and tt are positive integers. Equality-case conjecture. Then at\mathfrak{a}^t and JsJ^s have the same integral closure. The source notes that this is known when d=2d=2, and more generally when {a1,…,ad}\{a_1,\ldots,a_d\} has at most two elements; the general case remains open in the stated context.

References

Primary source

Craig Huneke, Shunsuke Takagi and Kei-ichi Watanabe, “Multiplicity bounds in graded rings”, arXiv:0912.3853 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.