The zero-location conjecture for fused transfer-matrix functions

Let uu be sufficiently small, with u1|u|\ll 1, let ss be a positive integer, and let a{1,2,,s}a\in\{1,2,\dots,s\}. For each positive integer mm, let Tm(a)(v)T^{(a)}_{m}(v) denote the transfer-matrix function defined in the preceding construction, and call

{vC:Imv[12,12]}\{v\in\mathbb{C}:\operatorname{Im}v\in[-\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2}]\}

the physical strip. Zero-location conjecture. Every zero of Tm(a)(v)T^{(a)}_{m}(v) is located outside the physical strip.

This analyticity property is expected for the two-string solution that provides the largest quantum-transfer-matrix eigenvalue in the sector N=M1=M2==MsN=M_{1}=M_{2}=\cdots=M_{s}, based on numerical analysis for finite NN, uu, and ss. The source gives no proof or resolution of the conjecture.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Zengo Tsuboi, “T-system and thermodynamic Bethe ansatz equations for solvable lattice models associated with superalgebras”, arXiv:0912.0073 (2010).

Additional references

2 papers in this index state this conjecture (2004–2009). The statement above is taken from the most recent of them; the others are arXiv:cond-mat/0412698.

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.