The absence of poles conjecture for motivic Donaldson–Thomas invariants

Let Γ\Gamma be the lattice of a 3d3d Calabi–Yau category with a stability condition, let VV be a strict sector, and let AV,qA_{V,q} be the corresponding element of the completed quantum torus. Write

C0(V)=C0(V,Z,Q),Dq+:=Z[q±1/2].C_0(V)=C_0(V,Z,Q),\qquad D_q^+:={\bf Z}[q^{\pm 1/2}].

Absence of poles conjecture. For any 3d3d Calabi–Yau category with a stability condition and any strict sector VV, the automorphism xAV,qxAV,q1x\mapsto A_{V,q}xA_{V,q}^{-1} preserves the subring

γC0(V)ΓDq+e^γ.\prod_{\gamma\in C_0(V)\cap \Gamma}D_q^+\hat{e}_{\gamma}.

The conjecture asserts that the quantum wall-crossing automorphism has no poles at roots of unity; it is still open in general, although partial results confirm it.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Maxim Kontsevich and Yan Soibelman, “Motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants: summary of results”, arXiv:0910.4315 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.