Supporting-tree decomposition conjecture for dyadic rearrangements

About 17 years old · traced to

Let \t\t be a rearrangement of the dyadic intervals, and write \cF1,…,\cFN\cF_1,\dots,\cF_N for subcollections of the dyadic intervals. Suppose there is a constant CC such that, for every dyadic interval II,

∣⋃J\sbeI\t(J)∣≤C∣I∣and∣⋃J\sbeI\t−1(J)∣≤C∣I∣.\left|\bigcup_{J\sbe I}\t(J)\right|\leq C|I|\quad\text{and}\quad\left|\bigcup_{J\sbe I}\t^{-1}(J)\right|\leq C|I|.

A collection admits a supporting tree if there are measurable sets AIA_I forming a tree, with uniformly controlled measure and uniformly positive intersections with both II and \t(I)\t(I). Supporting-tree decomposition conjecture. Do these two inequalities imply that the entire collection of dyadic intervals can be decomposed into \cF1,…,\cFN\cF_1,\dots,\cF_N, with N=N(C)N=N(C), so that each restriction \t:\cFi→\t(\cFi)\t:\cF_i\to\t(\cF_i) admits a supporting tree? Such a decomposition would provide a combinatorial route to vector-valued boundedness for rearrangement operators; the supplied text does not state whether this problem has been resolved.

References

Primary source

Anna Kamont and Paul F. X. Mueller, “Rearrangements with supporting Trees, Isomorphisms and Combinatorics of coloured dyadic Intervals”, arXiv:0909.4926 (2009).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.