Supporting-tree decomposition conjecture for dyadic rearrangements

Let \t\t be a rearrangement of the dyadic intervals, and write \cF1,,\cFN\cF_1,\dots,\cF_N for subcollections of the dyadic intervals. Suppose there is a constant CC such that, for every dyadic interval II,

J\sbeI\t(J)CIandJ\sbeI\t1(J)CI.\left|\bigcup_{J\sbe I}\t(J)\right|\leq C|I|\quad\text{and}\quad\left|\bigcup_{J\sbe I}\t^{-1}(J)\right|\leq C|I|.

A collection admits a supporting tree if there are measurable sets AIA_I forming a tree, with uniformly controlled measure and uniformly positive intersections with both II and \t(I)\t(I). Supporting-tree decomposition conjecture. Do these two inequalities imply that the entire collection of dyadic intervals can be decomposed into \cF1,,\cFN\cF_1,\dots,\cF_N, with N=N(C)N=N(C), so that each restriction \t:\cFi\t(\cFi)\t:\cF_i\to\t(\cF_i) admits a supporting tree? Such a decomposition would provide a combinatorial route to vector-valued boundedness for rearrangement operators; the supplied text does not state whether this problem has been resolved.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Anna Kamont and Paul F. X. Mueller, “Rearrangements with supporting Trees, Isomorphisms and Combinatorics of coloured dyadic Intervals”, arXiv:0909.4926 (2009).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.