The theta-function vanishing conjecture for tetrahedrally symmetric monopoles

At least 16 years old · documented by

Let H(y)=h−1(y)h0(y)h1(y)H(y)=h_{-1}(y)h_0(y)h_1(y) be the elliptic function defined from the functions hkh_k in Proposition preceding the conjecture. For relatively prime integers (m,n)=1(m,n)=1 satisfying (2n−m)(n+m)>0(2n-m)(n+m)>0, set

y=y(λ)=λ(n+m)ρ/3,T=2i3(n+m)/(2n−m).y=y(\lambda)=\lambda(n+m)\rho/3,\qquad \mathcal{T}=2i\sqrt{3}(n+m)/(2n-m).

Theta-function vanishing conjecture. For each such pair (m,n)(m,n), H(y)H(y) vanishes 2(∣n∣−1)2(|n|-1) times on the interval λ∈(0,2)\lambda\in(0,2).

This conjecture concerns the final vanishing condition needed to establish the existence of monopoles with the specified tetrahedrally symmetric spectral curve. The supplied text reports numerical evidence, but gives no resolution, so the conjecture remains open.

References

Primary source

H. W. Braden and V. Z. Enolski, “On the tetrahedrally symmetric monopole”, arXiv:0908.3449 (2009).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.