Conjecture on canonical models of small geometric transitions
A geometric transition is abbreviated g.t.; a geometric transition is small when it is small. A conifold degeneration is a degeneration through conifold singularities, and a composition of conifold transitions is an iterated sequence of conifold transitions. Two geometric transitions are equivalent when they represent the same transition in the sense used in the source.
Small-transition decomposition conjecture. Every small geometric transition which does not admit any conifold degeneration is equivalent to a composition of conifold transitions. Consequently, canonical models of small geometric transitions are given by compositions of conifold transitions.
The source presents this as a stronger version of the preceding conjectures and cites the conifold decomposition of the Namikawa small and rigid geometric transition as evidence. The supplied text gives no resolution status.
References
Primary source
Michele Rossi, “Analytic equivalence of geometric transitions”, arXiv:0807.4110 (2014).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
No solutions have been posted yet.