The domination conjecture for pairings of rational curves on K3 surfaces

Let XX be a K3K3 surface, and let MM and NN be rational curves on XX meeting transversely at at least two distinct points r1r_1 and r2r_2. Suppose that

MN0.M^\perp\cap N^\perp\ne 0.

Let (X,M,N)({\mathcal X},{\mathcal M},{\mathcal N}) be a general deformation of (X,M,N)(X,M,N): X{\mathcal X} is a family of K3K3 surfaces over a quasi-projective curve Γ\Gamma, and M{\mathcal M} and NX{\mathcal N}\subset {\mathcal X} are families of rational curves over Γ\Gamma with (X0,M0,N0)=(X,M,N)({\mathcal X}_0,{\mathcal M}_0,{\mathcal N}_0)=(X,M,N). Fix sections R1R_1 and R2R_2 of X/Γ{\mathcal X}/\Gamma with RiMNR_i\subset {\mathcal M}\cap {\mathcal N} and RiX0=riR_i\cap {\mathcal X}_0=r_i for i=1,2i=1,2. Let hh be the family version of the map from MN{\mathcal M}^\perp\cap {\mathcal N}^\perp to C{\mathbb C}^*, with

MN={γPic(X/Γ):γM=γN=0}.{\mathcal M}^\perp\cap {\mathcal N}^\perp=\{\gamma\in\operatorname{Pic}({\mathcal X}/\Gamma):\gamma\cdot{\mathcal M}=\gamma\cdot{\mathcal N}=0\}.

Domination conjecture. The variety C{\mathbb C}^* is dominated by one of the components of MN{\mathcal M}^\perp\cap {\mathcal N}^\perp under the map hh.

This conjecture asserts that the family-level pairing map has a component whose image is dominant. The source gives no evidence of a resolution, so its status remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Xi Chen and James D. Lewis, “Real Regulators on Self-Products of K3 Surfaces”, arXiv:0806.2676 (2008).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.