Gram-matrix parity conjecture for the dual canonical basis

Let TLMTL_M be the Temperley–Lieb algebra, let {ti}\{t_i\} be the dual canonical basis vectors obtained from the corresponding algebra elements aia_i, and let \Greekmath0111{\Greekmath 0111} define the product on the representation space. Denote by GG their Gram matrix:

Gij=ti,\Greekmath0111tj.G_{ij}=\langle t_i,{\Greekmath 0111} t_j\rangle.

For an algebra element aa, define

\limfunc{tr}a=\limfunc{tr}ae_M=\relax\protect\ifmmode\expandafter\text@\else\expandafter\text\fi{the number of closed loops}

obtained by closing the planar diagram associated with aa.

Gram-matrix parity conjecture. One has

G_{ij}=0\qquad\relax\protect\ifmmode\expandafter\text@\else\expandafter\text\fi{whenever}\qquad \limfunc{tr}(a_i a_j)=0\pmod 2,

where aia_i and aja_j are the algebra elements corresponding to tit_i and tjt_j, respectively.

The conjecture is based on numerical computations for M=3,5,7M=3,5,7 and predicts a parity-controlled vanishing pattern for the Gram matrix in the dual canonical basis. The supplied passage does not state a proof or a resolution, so the conjecture remains open.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Christian Korff, “PT Symmetry of the non-Hermitian XX Spin-Chain: Non-local Bulk Interaction from Complex Boundary Fields”, arXiv:0803.4500 (2008).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.