Travkin's asymptotic mirabolic bimodule conjecture

From papers

Let ν\nu be a partition of NN, let cνSNc_\nu\subset\mathfrak S_N be the corresponding two-sided Kazhdan–Lusztig cell, and let aνa_\nu be its aa-function. For a pair of partitions νθ\nu\supset\theta, let cνθνRBc_{\nu\supset\theta\subset\nu}\subset RB be the corresponding bimodule Kazhdan–Lusztig cell. Let JνθνJ_{\nu\supset\theta\subset\nu} be the asymptotic bimodule with basis {tw~:w~cνθν}\{t_{\tilde w}:\tilde w\in c_{\nu\supset\theta\subset\nu}\}, and let St(ν)\operatorname{St}(\nu) denote the set of standard tableaux of shape ν\nu.

Asymptotic mirabolic bimodule conjecture. The based bimodule

Jνθν, {tw~:w~cνθν}J_{\nu\supset\theta\subset\nu},\ \{t_{\tilde w}:\tilde w\in c_{\nu\supset\theta\subset\nu}\}

is isomorphic to the based regular bimodule

MatSt(ν), {eT1,T2},\operatorname{Mat}_{\operatorname{St}(\nu)},\ \{e_{T_1,T_2}\},

with tw~t_{\tilde w} mapped to eT1,T2e_{T_1,T_2}, where (T1,T2)(T_1,T_2) are obtained from w~\tilde w by mirabolic RSK.

This is the asymptotic-bimodule strengthening of the expected RSK description of bimodule cells. The preceding degree bound is itself conjectural in the source, and no resolution is supplied.

Progress summary

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Roman Travkin, “Mirabolic Robinson-Schensted-Knuth correspondence”, arXiv:0802.1651 (2021).

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.