Strange duality for Mukai moduli spaces on K3 and abelian surfaces

About 19 years old · traced to

Let XX be a K3K3 or abelian surface. Let vv and ww be primitive, positive Mukai vectors satisfying χ(v⊗w)=0\chi(v\otimes w)=0 and

c1(v⊗w)⋅H>0.c_{1}(v\otimes w)\cdot H>0.

For a K3K3 surface, let (Mv,Mw)=(Mv,Mw)(\mathcal M_v,\mathcal M_w)=({\mathfrak M}_v,{\mathfrak M}_w); for an abelian surface, let it be one of (Kv,Mw)(K_v,\mathfrak M_w), (Kw,Mv)(K_w,\mathfrak M_v), (Mv+,Mw+)({\mathfrak M}^{+}_v,{\mathfrak M}^{+}_w), or (Mv−,Mw−)({\mathfrak M}^{-}_v,{\mathfrak M}^{-}_w). The duality morphism is

D:H0(Mv,Θw)∨→H0(Mw,Θv).\mathsf {D}:H^{0}(\mathcal M_{v}, \Theta_{w})^{\vee} \to H^{0}(\mathcal M_{w}, \Theta_{v}).

Mukai strange-duality conjecture. The duality morphism D\mathsf {D} is either an isomorphism or zero. Numerical symmetry and vanishing results motivate this dichotomy, while the paper does not determine which alternative occurs in general.

References

Primary source

Alina Marian and Dragos Oprea, “A tour of theta dualities on moduli spaces of sheaves”, arXiv:0710.2908 (2008).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.