Conjecture on non-stabilized boundary stabilizations for the T(7,17,2,10m−4) family
Conjecture on non-stabilized boundary stabilizations for the T(7,17,2,10m−4) family
Let , and let be the unique minimal genus-two Heegaard splitting of its exterior . Let be the boundary stabilization of , which is a genus-three Heegaard splitting. The non-stabilized boundary-stabilization conjecture. The splitting is non-stabilized. The construction gives weakly reducible genus-three splittings, and the non--primitive properties established for this family rule out the obvious stabilization mechanism; whether these splittings are non-stabilized is left as a conjecture.
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Yoav Moriah and Eric Sedgwick, “Heegaard Splittings of Twisted Torus Knots”, arXiv:0709.2249 (2008).
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.