Fibrewise homotopy invariance conjecture for the signature L2L^2-rho form

Let π ⁣:MB\pi\colon M\to B and θ ⁣:NB\theta\colon N\to B be smooth fibre bundles of compact manifolds over the same base, with normal Γ\Gamma-coverings p ⁣:M~Mp\colon \widetilde M\to M and q ⁣:N~Nq\colon \widetilde N\to N, where Γ\Gamma is a discrete group. A Γ\Gamma-fibrewise homotopy equivalence is a fibrewise homotopy equivalence compatible up to homotopy with the classifying maps to BΓB\Gamma. Let D~M/Bsign\mathcal{\widetilde D}^{\mathrm{sign}}_{M/B} and D~N/Bsign\mathcal{\widetilde D}^{\mathrm{sign}}_{N/B} be the lifted families of signature operators, and let ρ^(2)\hat\rho_{(2)} denote their fibrewise L2L^2-rho forms. Fibrewise homotopy invariance conjecture. Assume that Γ\Gamma is torsion-free and satisfies the Baum–Connes conjecture for the maximal CC^*-algebra. If hh is an orientation-preserving Γ\Gamma-fibrewise homotopy equivalence between (π,p)(\pi,p) and (θ,q)(\theta,q), and both lifted signature families have smooth spectral projections and Novikov–Shubin invariants greater than 3(dimB+1)3(\mathop{\rm \dim} B+1), then

[ρ^(2)(D~M/Bsign)]=[ρ^(2)(D~N/Bsign)]HdR(B).[\hat\rho_{(2)}(\mathcal{\widetilde D}^{\mathrm{sign}}_{M/B})]=[\hat\rho_{(2)}(\mathcal{\widetilde D}^{\mathrm{sign}}_{N/B})]\in H^*_{\mathrm{dR}}(B).

This predicts that the fibrewise L2L^2-rho cohomology class of the signature family is invariant under the stated geometric equivalence and analytic regularity assumptions; the source gives no resolution status.

Sources & referencesView supporting material

Primary source

Sara Azzali, “L^2 rho form for normal coverings of fibre bundles”, arXiv:0704.0909 (2010).

Progress summary

Never refreshed

Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.