Lindelöf hypothesis
Lindelöf hypothesis
Let denote the Riemann zeta function, i.e. the meromorphic continuation to of the function defined by for .
For define
where the -estimate is taken as the real variable tends to .
Then
that is, for every there is a constant such that
Equivalently, as for every .
Equivalent formulations 1
Other statements of this same problem, merged from separate entries. Each is equivalent to the statement above — proving any one settles them all.
The Lindelöf Hypothesis
Let denote the real-valued Hardy function associated with the Riemann zeta function, and let .
Lindelöf Hypothesis. As ,
Equivalently,
The Lindelöf Hypothesis is a central conjecture about the growth of the zeta function on the critical line and is weaker than the Riemann Hypothesis. Its status is open.
source: David W. Farmer, “Currently there are no reasons to doubt the Riemann Hypothesis: The zeta function beyond the realm of computation”, arXiv:2211.11671 (2025).
Sources & referencesView supporting material
Primary source
Additional references
- Wikipedia, Lindelöf hypothesis, the article this problem comes from.
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 0
Sign in to submit a solution.
No solutions have been posted yet.