Fontaine–Mazur conjecture
Let be a number field with absolute Galois group , and let be a prime. Let
be a continuous representation. For a place of , let be a decomposition group at . Call geometric if
- is unramified at all but finitely many places of , and
- for every place , the restriction is de Rham in the sense of Fontaine's -adic Hodge theory. Equivalently, by the -adic monodromy theorem, it is potentially semistable.
Say that comes from algebraic geometry if there are a smooth projective variety over , integers and , such that is isomorphic to a subquotient of the -representation
Conjecture (Fontaine–Mazur). Every irreducible geometric representation comes from algebraic geometry.
The converse is a theorem. Étale cohomology of a smooth projective variety is unramified outside the primes of bad reduction and , and it is de Rham at by the comparison theorems of Faltings and Tsuji. A solution must prove the conjecture for every number field , prime and dimension . Fontaine and Mazur also state consequences for specific cases. For example, an irreducible representation unramified at all places above and at almost all other places should have finite image [1].
Background
Fontaine and Mazur formulated the conjecture in 1993 [1]. It gives a purely local criterion, at the primes above , for a global -adic Galois representation to be motivic. The theory of Fontaine provides the local condition: being de Rham is the -adic analogue of the Hodge decomposition.
The conjecture connects with the Langlands program. For and , Fontaine and Mazur conjectured that an irreducible odd geometric representation with distinct Hodge–Tate weights is, up to a twist, the representation attached to a classical cuspidal eigenform. Such representations come from algebraic geometry by work of Eichler, Shimura, Deligne and Scholl. In general, combined with the Langlands correspondence, the conjecture predicts that geometric representations correspond to algebraic automorphic representations. The case is known by class field theory and the theory of locally algebraic abelian representations of Serre.
References
- J.-M. Fontaine and B. Mazur, "Geometric Galois representations", in Elliptic Curves, Modular Forms, & Fermat's Last Theorem (Hong Kong, 1993), Ser. Number Theory I, International Press (1995).
- M. Kisin, "The Fontaine–Mazur conjecture for ", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (2009), 641–690. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-09-00628-6
- L. Pan, "The Fontaine–Mazur conjecture in the residually reducible case", J. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (2022), 1031–1169. doi:10.1090/jams/991 arXiv:1901.07166
- F. Calegari, "Even Galois representations and the Fontaine–Mazur conjecture", Invent. Math. 185 (2011), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s00222-010-0297-0
- T. Barnet-Lamb, T. Gee, D. Geraghty and R. Taylor, "Potential automorphy and change of weight", Ann. of Math. 179 (2014), 501–609. doi:10.4007/annals.2014.179.2.3
- Wikipedia, Fontaine–Mazur conjecture.
Source: Wikipedia
Progress summary
Nothing recorded yet. Refresh searches the literature and the public web for attempts on this problem, and writes the first summary here.
Solutions 1
Claimed by OpenAI.See full solution
Odd, irreducible two-dimensional 2-adic representations over Q, finite ramification and de Rham with distinct Hodge–Tate weights; modularity up to Tate twist. Covers odd regular p=2 case, not all representations in broader target.
Repository: https://github.com/openai/math
- OpenAI-010-03-Fontaine-Mazur-modularity-at-the-prime-2.pdfOpen