Erdős Problem #953 — Let A⊂{x∈R2:∣x∣<r}A\subset \{ x\in \mathbb{R}^2 : \lvert x\rvert <r\} be a measurable set with no integer distances, that is, such that ∣a−b∣ot∈Z\lvert a-b\rvert ot\in \mathbb{Z} for any distinct a,b∈Aa,b\in A.

About 49 years old · traced to

Let A⊂{x∈R2:∣x∣<r}A\subset \{ x\in \mathbb{R}^2 : \lvert x\rvert <r\} be a measurable set with no integer distances, that is, such that ∣a−b∣ot∈Z\lvert a-b\rvert ot\in \mathbb{Z} for any distinct a,b∈Aa,b\in A. How large can the measure of AA be?

References

Progress summary

Refreshed
Claimed progress

A 2026 paper improves the known bounds on the largest such set, but does not determine its size.

Erdős Problem #953 asks how large a measurable subset of a disk in the plane can be if it contains no pair at an integer distance. The problem remains unresolved.

Known results

  • For disk radius XX, the maximum measure satisfies the elementary upper bound f(X)=O(X)f(X)=O(X).
  • Thickening Sárközy’s construction gives the lower bound f(X)=Ω(X1/2−o(1))f(X)=\Omega(X^{1/2-o(1)}).
  • For an open-set variant with a fixed number of connected components, an exact extremal formula is known, but it does not settle the measurable-set problem.

May 2026 bounds

The paper “Point sets avoiding near-integer distances” formulates the measurable quantity f(X)f(X) and records the bounds above, while explicitly leaving sharper measurable-set bounds open. Its acknowledgment of Gemini 3.1 Pro and ChatGPT5 concerns generating proof ideas, not solving this problem.

Current status (as of August 2026): Partial progress consists of f(X)=O(X)f(X)=O(X) and f(X)=Ω(X1/2−o(1))f(X)=\Omega(X^{1/2-o(1)}); the correct growth rate and extremal measure remain open.

Sources

Solutions 0

No solutions have been posted yet.